Portland is often called the model of a well-planned city. This
is doubtless a consequence of Oregon's practical land-use policies,
especially the 1974 set-up of an urban growth boundary. This move
conserved land in the style of farming practices of the 1800s. This was
uncharacteristic in a period when many areas neglected their major
cities for expansion along highways, satellite cities and suburbs.
However,
there are real estate investors and developers who do not quite concur
with the urban growth boundary. They reason that the boundary has been a
double-edged sword. In other words, it has given not only benefits, but
a stark rise in housing costs. Yet housing costs are distinctly less
than in metropolitan areas in Washington and California. Furthermore,
the inhabitants enjoy the benefits of a compact area that has a
well-organized public transportation system and less traffic. Also, the
city's Development Commission has a big hand in Portland's growth.
Established in 1958, it offers economic development and housing programs
in the city.
The thickly inhabited parts of Portland are rather
uneven, with the West Hills bordering the west side, while the east is
much flatter and spans about 170 blocks until Gresham. They stretch from
the start of East Portland to the periphery of Gresham's suburbs.
Beyond that lies rural Multnomah County.
Greater parts of inner
Portland, as well as downtown Portland, have narrow streets and compact
city blocks. Each block is 60m square. Twenty separate combined blocks,
each measuring 80m long, align one mile of road. Most streets are 20m
wide; the mix of narrow streets and compact blocks makes downtown
Portland pedestrian-friendly. In comparison, Manhattan's east-west
streets are separated into blocks that measure 180 to 240m long; Seattle
has city blocks that measure 70 by 100m.
No comments:
Post a Comment